Mobility Isn’t Mobile Without Infrastructure
There’s a palpable buzz about BYOD, MDM and mobile virtualization and it’s often discussed as if infrastructure is a given, but it’s not. However, there’s good reason for the channel to care about wireless infrastructure just as much as the devices themselves. Wireless LAN is the linchpin of mobility.
Hardware sales are at a steady decline – it’s true. The move to the cloud has eliminated demand for on-premise equipment, nearly obliterating the need for an on-site data center. But there will always be the need for some level of infrastructure, especially since cellular data speeds have yet to match 802.11 performance.
A recent study by the Dell’Oro group has uncovered that in Q2 2012, wireless LAN revenues jumped 16 percent year over year. When constrained to just the enterprise, those figures reveal a 26 percent jump year over year. That should raise more than a few eyebrows.
What’s more, 802.11 technology is improving quickly, with 802.11n maturing nicely and 802.11ac in the pipeline. Together, these standards will bring near-hardwire speeds to the wireless ether. And with that level of performance, WiFi is no longer corporate luxury, it’s a real need. One analyst at Dell’Oro summed it up thusly. “Enterprises now consider Wireless LAN infrastructure systems to be just as important as their wired Ethernet systems, which is driving a need for combined management systems for wired and wireless access at the edge of the enterprise.”
Dell’Oro also noted this coincided with strong performance from wireless LAN vendors. No surprises here, Cisco Systems Inc. reigned supreme in market share,
for enterprise WLAN, with Aruba Networks and Hewlett-Packard right behind them. Interestingly, NETGEAR took the lead with the most revenue derived from WLAN, although Cisco trailed right behind it. Specifically for the service provider WiFi market, HP, Cisco and Ruckus Wireless were ”in a near dead heat for top vendor ranking.”
This should give the channel something to chew on, especially when considering a vendor to partner with. But it also means there are converged opportunities in enterprise mobility and wireless infrastructure. It’s not enough to offer BYOD/MDM stand-alone or looped into another networking package. A true mobility package must deliver linkage between a new computing paradigm and the infrastructure that supports it.
VARs and solution providers can approach BYOD/MDM with a conversation about what devices are to be leveraged, which can guide the discussion about what kind of WLAN deployment will be needed. From there, all other solutions can grow. This should making it much easier to implement and manage in the future, especially since the foundation for VDI or cloud mobility may already in place. In fact, this is the exact plan ADTRAN expressed with its MSP-centric wireless access points.
In short, despite its unpopularity, hardware shouldn’t be shunned. As 2012 comes to a close and 2013 rolls on, it’s clear that hardware has a place, so long as is specialized. Delivering laser-focused hardware/software packages will be key to driving successful mobility business and creating customer stickiness. If Cisco’s latest software licensing moves are any indication, it’s possible the hardware/software strategy Cisco has touted all along may pay its highest dividends in the mobility world.
One Response to “Mobility Isn’t Mobile Without Infrastructure”
Leave a Reply
|
|



One thing you didn’t mention is that there is also a cost to apps and software that will run on mobile networks. We use Tigertext for security and HIPPA compliance. Mobile device usage is like ants marching. You can’t stop it. So true. This is how I explain the Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) issue to upper management.
This is a big issue in the healthcare industry, where HIPAA and patient data confidentiality can lead to major law suits for loss or unsecured use of data by mobile devices.
The problem is that the data is on the BYOD device, and if it is lost or stolen, then the data can be accessed.
The problem is that the large centralized BYOD systems are expensive and very restricting for the users.
Like ants, we can’t stop doctors and nurse from emailing or texting confidential patient data from their smart phones and iPads.
Instead, we try to provide them with tools to help them keep the data secure.
Example, for text messaging we got all the doctors to use Tigertext, which is HIPAA compliant since it is a secure closed network that works on most smartphones, and deletes the text message after a period of time. At $10 a user it is very cost effective and saving the hospital from millions in law suits.
I think BYOD policy and technologies are going to be the major focus of IT departments for sometime to come, and cost effective and easy to use and implement solutions that work on personal devices will be key to solving the security issues related to BYOD.