Larry Walsh is the CEO, chief analyst, and founder of Channelnomics. He’s an expert on the development and execution of channel programs, disruptive sales models, and growth strategies for companies worldwide.
Channel professionals and leaders have varying opinions about distribution. Many see it as a necessity to work with partners and get products to market. Others understand distribution’s role in the go-to-market process but harbor doubts about distributors’ contributions to their channel success. Some don’t see the value of distribution but work with two-tier partners out of pure necessity.
Regardless of how a vendor or channel professional views distribution, the industry is clear in its value sentiment: Distribution is here to stay. According to a survey by Channelnomics and the Global Technology Distribution Council (GTDC), 75% of channel professionals believe distribution’s value and contributions to vendors’ success will increase or remain the same over the next five years.
Despite the recognized importance of distributors, however, the lack of a formal distribution program can hinder the effectiveness of relationships with two-tier partners. Many vendors treat these relationships as bespoke agreements that lack standard structures and consistency. This ad hoc approach can lead to systemic challenges, as the Channelnomics-GTDC survey highlights. Vendors often face difficulties with distributors not recruiting and developing new partners, lacking the ability to adapt to changing market demands, providing lackluster marketing support, and causing general channel conflict.
These challenges often arise from the absence of formal structures in vendor-distributor relationships. While many vendors consider distributors as go-to-market partners, the lack of formal distribution programs results in each distributor having different contract provisions, expectations, and compensation. This inconsistency is further complicated by regional variations — how a vendor works with a distributor in North America, for example, may differ significantly from their operations in Europe or Asia.
The absence of a formalized distribution structure creates inefficiencies and inconsistencies in channel operations, leading to wasted budgets and efforts. Vendors must implement formal programs with well-defined requirements, clear performance expectations, and measurable metrics to address this. This structured approach can provide the necessary direction and control to maximize the value derived from distribution partnerships.
A formal distribution program is essential for vendors to manage their channel strategy effectively. It ensures that all parties involved — vendors, distributors, and partners — are aligned in their market focus and goals. This alignment is critical for driving outcomes that benefit everyone. Here’s why vendors should implement a structured approach:
A formal distribution program is crucial to a vendor’s channel strategy. It emphasizes alignment, measurable outcomes, consistency, and regulatory compliance. The program also ensures fairness and manageability while keeping costs under control. Implementing a structured program helps vendors strengthen their channel relationships, streamline operations, and achieve sustainable growth.
Larry Walsh is the CEO, chief analyst, and founder of Channelnomics. He’s an expert on the development and execution of channel programs, disruptive sales models, and growth strategies for companies worldwide.